IN7OMM.COM
Search page
Deutsch | Language
7OMM e-News
Rumour Mill
Contact | Volunteers

WHAT'S ON IN 7OMM?
Todd-AO Festival
KRRR! 70mm Seminar
Widescreen Weekend
7OMM Festival
 

7OMM FILM
"Flying Clipper"
"The Hateful Eight"
"The Master"
"Oklahoma!"
"Scent of Mystery"
"2OO1"

IN LARGE FORMAT
Todd-AO
Ultra Panavision 70
Super Panavision 70
Dimension 150
DEFA 70
Sovscope 70
Technirama
IMAX
Showscan
Cinerama
Cinemiracle
70mm Blow-up

NEWS
2016 | 2015 | 2014
2013 | 2012 | 2011
2010 | 2009 | 2008
2007 | 2006 | 2005
2004 | 2003 | 2002

LIBRARY
Interview & People
Cinemas
DP70 / Norelco AAII
70mm Projectors
Rama Galore
Cinerama Remaster
70mm Engagements
SENSURROUND
Stories
Remember

THE 7OMM NEWSLETTER
2005 | 2004 | 2002
2001 | 2000 | 1999
1998 | 1997 | 1996
1995 | 1994 | PDF
 

in70mm.com Mission:
• To record the history of the large format movies and the 70mm cinemas as remembered by the people who worked with the films. Both during making and during running the films in projection rooms and as the audience, looking at the curved screen.
in70mm.com, a unique internet based magazine, with articles about 70mm cinemas, 70mm people, 70mm films, 70mm sound, 70mm film credits, 70mm history and 70mm technology. Readers and fans of 70mm are always welcome to contribute.

Disclaimer | Updates
Support us
Testimonials
Table of Content
 

eXTReMe Tracker
Extracts and longer parts of in70mm.com may be reprinted with the written permission from the editor.
Copyright © 1800 - 2070. All rights reserved.

Visit biografmuseet.dk about Danish cinemas

 

Paul Thomas Anderson's "The Master" - Germany-Premiere in Panavision Super 70
Translation from the German article, first published in "Cine 8-16" #24, December 2012

Read more at
in70mm.com
The 70mm Newsletter
Written by: Clemens Scherer. Editorial assistance: Paul Rayton. Images by: Thomas HauerslevDate: 15.02.2013
A serious occupation with presenting 70 mm-format films and all its wonders -- elements that allow for the presentation of the film print copies in the best possible quality -- had an extra side effect and special coincidence for the Schauburg Kino in Karlsruhe. For a presentation within the framework of the 8. TODD-AO Festivals (Oct. 5-7, 2012), the Schauburg had a surprise adjustment to the calendar, being granted the honor to show the new film from director Paul Thomas Anderson, "The Master" in a 70 mm print. This screening, which was the German Premiere, caused great interest. The last times audiences had seen a narrative feature film produced with 65 mm photography had been in 1992 for "Far and Away" (In einem fernen Land) and in 1996 for Kenneth Branaghs "Hamlet". These were long ago (at the least, 16 years!), and it had reached the point that almost nobody on earth ever expected to see another new film with 65 mm photography, and have it be presented through a classic 70 mm projection.

Followers of Mr. Anderson knew that, in planning for this movie, Mr. Anderson first thought about shooting "The Master" in VistaVision, which is a classic camera-format designed for taking pictures on film resulting in a width-to-height ratio of up to 1.85:1, with definition comparable to 65 mm, but still accomplished by using conventional 35 mm filmstocks. How well this worked in former times can be seen in, among others, the restored classic Hitchcock film "Vertigo" (1958), photographed in VistaVision, which was then restored to 70 mm prints in the early 1990s. Anderson praised especially the strong colors and textures and the full satisfaction – very obvious with "Vertigo".
 
More in 70mm reading:

Paul Thomas Andersons "The Master" - Die Deutschland-Premiere in Panavision Super 70

"The Master" goes to Karlsruhe for 70mm Festival

Photography of "The Master" in 65mm

"The Master" goes to Denmark in 70mm

Internet link:

Senator film

Cine 8-16

Schauburg.de

The Master

 
But then it turned out that with a ready-to-operate VistaVision-Camera the results were not absolutely convincing, so alternatively Anderson started experimenting with a 65 mm-Camera. The results were so successful that he was able to convince his producers to let the film be photographed in Panavision Super 70 (which uses 65 mm film for the camera negative).

On October 7th, the assembled 70 mm-Experts -- plus a bunch of fans of the films of P. T. Anderson -- could actually now view this extraordinary "experiment" in a quite crowded cinema. The beginning of the movie brought a first surprise: Anderson had, in fact, composed the movie for 1.85:1 and kept this ratio, now contained within the classic, originally intended 70 mm 'wide-screen format' aspect ratio of 2.21:1. So the image is "pillarboxed" on the larger frame to be presented at the desired 1.85:1. But then it was time for the story to take its course. We see Joaquin Phoenix, who leaves no more doubt in his role as Freddie Quell -- meanwhile totally instinct driven -- that it will be impossible for his character to return to normal civic society.

The images we see are clear with realistic, lively colors and no tendency toward chroma effects; simple, natural colors. Then, by chance Freddie has an encounter with Lancaster Dodd (Philip Seymour Hoffman). Dodd's "masterful" manner of handling Freddie is such that Freddie sees new aspects, giving him a new grip on life.

At the same time it is a great pleasure to see Hoffman's acting. He has the stature now to be placed among the great actors of our time, and who - possibly - will be one of the last of those acting in the view field of a camera exposing the scene on 65 mm film.
 
 
The storyline is vexing, however, as, by the time the movie concludes, the action has no climax. Up until the end we hold some expectation that the plot will reach some dramatic point of culmination, but this will not happen. We have seen a section of the life of some people, some chosen encounters, but did Anderson intend to give us a message?

Those of us who had expected a classical 70 mm film have been probably a little bit deceived. But in follow-up discussions about the message of the film concerning the scientology-movement, and if this presentation is making such power seeking movements harmless or conscious, made for lively conversation and many opinions.
 
 
Technically speaking, those who watched the film with special attention to the photography were particularly aware of the fact that some scenes had a minimized 'depth-of-field'. One single sharp object is outstandingly sharp, setting it apart from the (intentional) blurry picture of the surroundings. This object appears 'cut out', a special technique that is achieved best with large size photography. Anderson himself has remarked, how much this effect so strong with 65 mm photography has had an impact on him. He uses it to lead the view of the spectator, to get him to pay attention to the 'cut out' face - not to the master's outburst of fury, but to the effect of this on his adherents.

With classic 65/70 productions decades ago, such a minimized depth-of-field would have been considered a sacrilege! Intensive light power in correspondence with a larger f-stop number was then the key for the highly enhanced 'depth-of-field', so that the whole picture showed the highest possible resolution. Under this aspect, Anderson has really misused the format, exchanging, by choice, the exterior quality of a maximum sharpness against the inward one of leading the views by making use of the 'cut out' technique. When the message of this film is sought, one will find it the likeliest under this aspect.
 
 
Paul Thomas Anderson pays much attention that this 'cut out'-effect may reach as many spectators as possible. This has been successful to the point that, to date, there have been already 16 prints of "The Master" made on 70 mm film. Anderson prefers cinemas which can show this 70 mm format nowadays, even though they are much harder to find than in the heyday of 70 mm projection, the 1980s. For copying he went directly to the camera negative and cut that, to produce the 70 mm copies in analogue contact print procedures. He avoided the possibly-easier way of most movies today, the "D.I." (digital intermediate), the digital cut and post-process with the final reprint of the film being a reproduction from the digital files, or a 4K digital projection file, as was done with "Samsara", which was similarly photographed on 65 mm film. The digital path could have make him loose control, as it would have become too easy to digitally enhance that blurry content he had worked so hard to get, supposing to 'improve' but in fact destroying his work. By means of the well-tried, but more laborious, analog process he ensures that the 70 mm copies show the original content of the camera-negative with every included nuance. And if we are all lucky, by coincidence the film industry will learn from this -- how to succeed really without making the compromise.
 
 
  
Go: back - top - back issues - news index
Updated 22-12-16