“Almost like a real web site”

Search | Contact
News | e-News |
Rumour Mill | Stories
Foreign Language
in70mm.com auf Deutsch


Todd-AO Festival
KRRR! 7OMM Seminar
GIFF 70, Gentofte
Oslo 7OMM Festival
Widescreen Weekend

Premiere | Films
People | Equipment
Library | Cinemas
Todd-AO Projector
Distortion Correcting

Ultra Panavision 70
Super Panavision 70

1926 Natural Vision
1929 Grandeur
1930 Magnifilm
1930 Realife
1930 Vitascope
1952 Cinerama
1953 CinemaScope
1955 Todd-AO
1955 Circle Vision 360
1956 CinemaScope 55
1957 Ultra Panavision 70
1958 Cinemiracle
1958 Kinopanorama
1959 Super Panavision 70
1959 Super Technirama 70
1960 Smell-O-Vision
1961 Sovscope 70
Cinerama 360
1962 MCS-70
1963 70mm Blow Up
1963 Circarama
1963 Circlorama
1966 Dimension 150
1967 DEFA 70
1967 Pik-A-Movie
1970 IMAX / Omnimax
1974 Cinema 180
1976 Dolby Stereo
1984 Showscan
1984 Swissorama
1986 iWERKS
1989 ARRI 765
1990 CDS
1994 DTS / Datasat
2001 Super Dimension 70
2018 Magellan 65

Various Large format | 70mm to 3-strip | 3-strip to 70mm | Specialty Large Format | Special Effects in 65mm | ARC-120 | Super Dimension 70Early Large Format
7OMM Premiere in Chronological Order


Australia | Brazil
Canada | Denmark
England | France
Germany | Iran
Mexico | Norway
Sweden | Turkey

7OMM Projectors
People | Eulogy
65mm/70mm Workshop
The 7OMM Newsletter
Back issue | PDF
Academy of the WSW

• 2026 | 2025 | 2024
2023 | 2022 | 2021
2020 | 2019 | 2018
2017 | 2016 | 2015
2014 | 2013 | 2012
2011 | 2010 | 2009
2008 | 2007 | 2006
2005 | 2004 | 2003
2002 | 2001 | 2000
1999 | 1998 | 1997
1996 | 1995 | 1994

in70mm.com Mission:
• To record the history of the large format movies and the 70mm cinemas as remembered by the people who worked with the films. Both during making and during running the films in projection rooms and as the audience, looking at the curved screen.
in70mm.com, a unique internet based magazine, with articles about 70mm cinemas, 70mm people, 70mm films, 70mm sound, 70mm film credits, 70mm history and 70mm technology. Readers and fans of 70mm are always welcome to contribute.

Disclaimer | Updates
Support us
Table of Content

Extracts and longer parts of in70mm.com may be reprinted with the written permission from the editor.
Copyright ę 1800 - 2070. All rights reserved.

Visit biografmuseet.dk about Danish cinemas


How not to project "2001" in 70mm
2001: A Space Odyssey - Loews Astor Plaza, NYC

The 70mm Newsletter
Written by: Frank Angel, Dir, Brooklyn Center Cinema, NY, USA (Nov. or Dec. of 2003) Date: July 15, 2004 
Well, I got all excited last night after reading the previous post about the "2001: A Space Odyssey" 70mm presentation at the Astor Plaza in Manhattan; it was the last day it was playing. So at 9:15pm, I hopped in the car and drove at 75mph to get to the city to catch the very last show at 10:20pm. I have to agree with Bernie's post, the Astor Plaza is a far cry from its glory days. It seems like even what used to be the first run, "flagship" theatres like the Astor Plaza (where every show was a Roadshow presentation) have become nothing but corner-cutting, grind houses.

"2001: A Space Odyssey" 70mm quality? Or lack-thereof: So I get there just in time to catch the entr'acte Legetti music. Hmmm, the curtain is already opened and the audiences, about 150 -- a good crowd for a Tuesday night at 10:20pm, is sitting, staring at a blank, naked screen (years ago that used to be a mortal sin in showmanship). The dowser is opened which allows us to watch the scratches that have already accumulated on this fairly new print. Overture music fades, first frame hits the screen with the gorgeous, deep blue background and the stylized MGM logo....and it is out-of-frame. I mean frame-line in the middle of the screen out of frame. We wait. And wait. It takes the person who we know is not a projectionist (thanks to Bernie's previous post) almost to the end of the Zarathustra sequence to correct the misframe. Only he doesn't quite rack it down far enough, and so for the rest of the film we are treated to seeing the white negative splice flashes with EVERY shot change. Pretty damn distracting to say the least. OK I think, I can live with this...just ignore the flashes. But now it becomes all too apparent that something is wrong with the sound as well.

There is a very obvious flutter, much like you would hear if the tension rollers are not engaged properly on the mag heads or the sound drum is not spinning freely or the wrap around the drum is too tight or too loose. [Frank's note: to the best of my knowledge, this was a standard magnetic print, not DTS.] Or is it possible that it is simply a poorly recorded print? I conclude it was more than likely one of the local problems, not the fault of the print. This painful flutter continues for the entire film. Every time the horns in each of the Zarathustra sequences sound those predominant high notes, the people around me can hear my teeth grinding.

I go back to see if I could find someone, anyone who could address this problem. I am told by the kid sitting outside the projection booth door that THERE IS NO PROJECTIONIST. The kid is dressed in jeans and a sweatshirt -- seems this engagement doesn't even rate a full fledged manager to handle the booth -- it gets only an usher. "The projectionist," he explains to me, "comes in only on Fridays." How wonderful for us.

I said, "This can't be a digital soundtrack, can it?" He says, almost with a sense of pride, "Oh, I haven't the faintest idea. I just have to make the change if it messes up." I dig further and find out that by "the change" he meant from the 70mm projector to the 35mm projector which was running a 35mm backup print [running] simultaneously with the 70mm. He went on to say that at a few of the shows "the big film jumped out," so Warner Brothers made them run a 35mm backup. He couldn't give me any more details about what exactly did that mean, that the 70mm "jumped out," only that it was "messy." I'll bet!

Seems it would be to more to Warner's best interest to insist on having a FREAKING PROJECTIONIST in the booth at all times while they are running one of the three newly struck $20,000 70mm prints. After all, the theatre is taking its house-nut off the top, the contract should say the house-nut allowance MUST include a licensed Projectionist's salary and he has to stay IN THE BOOTH while the print is running. It couldn't be more simple. I asked if there was any problem with the projectors regarding the sound. He looked clueless. I said, "You DO hear how bad it sounds." He answerers, "Naw, it's an old film. It's the print." I knew I was doomed. I walked away mumbling, something like, yah, he doesn't know what sound format they are running but he knows whatever's wrong is the fault of the print.

Anyway, back to the presentation. OK, so the sound is bad and the picture isn't quite framed properly. Next is the DIRT. Gobs and gobs of it for the first half reel. And you know those opening scenes are basically stills. The dirt looks all the more obvious on a perfectly motionless shot. But there they were, not what I would consider ordinary dirt specs, but BIG black gobs of crap doing a dance all over the screen. Given that this is 70mm, you can imagine how much dirt had to be on film. What do these people do, stretch the first 175 ft of film across the floor and let the ushers walk on it? Absolutely unforgivable. Even if the print arrived with the dirt already on it, there's no reason why it couldn't have been cleaned prior to the show. What an application of Film-Guard (or any other film cleaner) would have done to improve this presentation!

Next come a bunch of scratches in a fade-to-black - the screen is totally dark and here are 4 or 5 parallel, white emulsion scratches on the black background over four or five frames. A good projectionist would at least have tried to blacken them with india ink so they wouldn't be so glaringly obvious and distracting.

Once we passed the dirt mines and the scratches, the picture cleanliness did improved, but the focus looked a tad soft for 70mm. I am thinking, I can get my 35mm print to focus as sharp as this. I just expected a bit more clarity. But in all fairness, it was quite watchable. Was the soft-ish focus the fault of the print? I am guessing probably not, given the fact that there was no one in the booth to touch up the focus throughout the entire 3 hours.

Now comes the intermission....or does it? Gee, I thought this is where it goes. Funny, it goes here in every show I have ever seen or run. Or maybe Mr. Kubrick left special instructions: "When you show "2001: A Space Odyssey" at the Loew's Astor Plaza, cut out the intermission and the Atmospheres music leading into the second half, and by the way, be sure to throw out the intermission music and the "Intermission" title footage before you ship the print out." Yeah, that's it...it was a note that Kubrick himself put right in the can....that's why they must have deleted it. The pigs.

So, the Astor Plaza managed to turn a spectacular, classic, Roadshow picture....one of the most powerful films of the last 100 years, into what we used to expect to see in the neighborhood, sub-run, underbelly, $1.00 grind houses running battered 35mm prints. The kind of thing where a Roadshow picture would play at the Rivoli on Broadway and right around the corner on Forty-Second Street, while the same title would be playing day-and-date at the Lyric or the Amsterdam at half price, but with a decided degradation in showmanship and presentation values. This was a Lyric level show.

Still, this is one awesome, powerful film of great impact -- the greatest work Kubrick ever created, IMHO. And it still holds up today, despite the lack of all that frenetic nonsense that most people expect to see. Every shot in "2001: A Space Odyssey" looks TOTALLY believable -- maybe because it was shot on 65mm neg and just maybe because NOT A SINGLE FRAME WAS GENERATED IN A COMPUTER!

There were three youngsters sitting in front of me at this show. I wondered what they thought of it and if they found some of the sequences slow, which is a common criticism of "2001: A Space Odyssey" from the MTV generation. After the show (much to my surprise and delight, these kids sat through the entire credits) I approached them and asked if they had seen it before -- they had....on TV. "Now you can understand why you really never SAW it before," says I. They all agreed whole heartedly. They asked me if I had seen it. I chuckled. I said, "yes, 30 years ago when I was a kid and it first came out, I saw it maybe 6 times, twice in Cinerama, then about 50 more times over the years in various theatres where I worked. They wanted to know what Cinerama was. That was all I needed. We talked until they threw us out of the lobby and then for another half-hour out in the street. They wanted to know all about Cinerama. One kid said "2001: A Space Odyssey" was one of the most beautiful films he had ever seen!

Guys, there may be hope yet.

PS -- there was no curtain after the show either. None at all. I mean, the theatre has one, but it just hung there....it never closed.
Further in 70mm reading:

"2001" release dates

Full credits for "2001:A Space Odyssey"

Internet link:

Brooklyn Center Cinema



Great website. And I am flattered that you would publish my post. However I would like to make just a few edits for clarity. This post was, I believe, to the www.35mmForum.com and references previous posts, so I will just clear some of that up. Also, to the best of my knowledge, this print was a mag print, not DTS. That assumption is based on the sound problem that definitely was the sound of a misthreading of the mag penthouse.

Anyway, here is the revised text and you are certainly welcome to post it. Again, thanks for considering it.

July 20, 2004
Go: back - top - back issues - news index
Updated 21-01-24