“Almost like a real web site”
 

IN7OMM.COM
Search | Contact
News | e-News
Rumour Mill | Stories
Foreign Language
Auf Deutsch

WHAT'S ON IN 7OMM?

7OMM FESTIVAL
Karlsruhe | Gentofte
Krnov | Varnsdorf
Banská Bystrica
Oslo | Bradford

TODD-AO PROCESS
Films | Premiere
People | Equipment
Library | Cinemas
Distortion Correcting
DP70 / AAII Projector
 

VISION, SCOPE & RAMA
1926 Natural Vision
1929 Grandeur
1930 Magnifilm
1930 Realife
1930 Vitascope
1952 Cinerama
1953 CinemaScope
1953 Panavison
1954 VistaVision
1955 Todd-AO
1955 Circle Vision 360
1956 CinemaScope 55
1957 Ultra Panavision 70
1958 Cinemiracle
1958 Kinopanorama
1959 Super Panavision 70
1959 Super Technirama 70
1960 Smell-O-Vision
1961 Sovscope 70
1962
Cinerama 360
1962 MCS-70
1963 70mm Blow Up
1963 Circarama
1963 Circlorama
1966 Dimension 150
1966
Stereo-70
1967 DEFA 70
1967 Pik-A-Movie
1970 IMAX / Omnimax
1974 Cinema 180
1974 SENSURROUND
1976 Dolby Stereo
1984 Showscan
1984 Swissorama
1986 iWERKS
1989 ARRI 765
1990 CDS
1994 DTS / Datasat
2001 Super Dimension 70
2018 Magellan 65

Various Large format | 70mm to 3-strip | 3-strip to 70mm | Specialty Large Format | Special Effects in 65mm | ARC-120 | Early Large Format
7OMM Premiere in Chronological Order

7OMM ON EARTH

Australia | Brazil | Canada | China | Denmark | England | France | Germany | Holland | India | Iran | Israel | Ireland | Mexico | Norway | Poland |  Russia | Spain | Sweden | Turkey | USA |

LIBRARY
7OMM Projectors
People | Eulogy
65mm/70mm Workshop
The 7OMM Newsletter
Back issue | PDF
Academy of the WSW

7OMM NEWS
• 2026 | 2025 | 2024
2023 | 2022 | 2021
2020 | 2019 | 2018
2017 | 2016 | 2015
2014 | 2013 | 2012
2011 | 2010 | 2009
2008 | 2007 | 2006
2005 | 2004 | 2003
2002 | 2001 | 2000
1999 | 1998 | 1997
1996 | 1995 | 1994
 

in70mm.com Mission:
• To record the history of the large format movies and the 70mm cinemas as remembered by the people who worked with the films. Both during making and during running the films in projection rooms and as the audience, looking at the curved screen.
in70mm.com, a unique internet based magazine, with articles about 70mm cinemas, 70mm people, 70mm films, 70mm sound, 70mm film credits, 70mm history and 70mm technology. Readers and fans of 70mm are always welcome to contribute.

Disclaimer | Updates
Support us | Staff
Testimonials
Table of Content
 

 
 
Extracts and longer parts of in70mm.com may be reprinted with the written permission from the editor.
Copyright © 1800 - 2070. All rights reserved.

Visit biografmuseet.dk about Danish cinemas

 

Footnotes To The Production Of "Motion" And "Sky Over Holland" By Robert Gaffney, Director Of Photography

Read more at
in70mm.com
The 70mm Newsletter
Written by: American Cinematographer, August 1967 Date: 12 September 2006
The overworked word "intrepid" applies most precisely to cameraman Gaffney. He is shown nonchalantly draped over the rail of an iceboat to operate the 70mm camera as skittish craft is about to take off over the ice at tremendous speed. Sequence appears in “Sky Over Holland”, which I s part of Netherlands EXPO exhibit. However, since Dutch pavilion has no 70mm projection facilities, pictorially beautiful film is shown only two evenings a week in CN Pavilion theatre.

The camera used for the filming of both the Canadian National film, “Motion”, and the Netherlands film, “Sky Over Holland”, was the M.C.S. 65mm Reflex Camera. Lenses consist of a full complement ranging from 600mm to 17˝ mm wide-angle. The camera was designed by Jan Jacobsen, who has also built a 65mm hand held, fully blimped camera with a lens covering 150 degrees. There is only one prototype of this model, and I have not seen or used it, but my assistant, Dieter Giebler, from Munich, has used it and states that it is quite good.

The lenses are of the following manufacture:

17˝ mm - Jan Jacobsen special built
21 mm - Jan Jacobsen special built
25 mm - Enna
37 mm - Enna
52 mm - Angenieux
80 mm - Carl Zeiss
100 mm - Cannon
135 mm - Kilfitt
600 mm - Kilfitt

The camera itself is of very simple design and rugged construction. It has with it 1000-foot and 500-foot magazines, matte-box, sunshade, variable speed motor, and sync motor. With additional motors, I have run this camera successfully from 1 through 40 F.P.S. To run at high speeds some gear changing must be made, but it can be done. All of the extra motors are used by piggy-backing them on the main variable speed motor. Thus, the sync motor is very small and light as the main drive motor is doing all of the work, while the sync motor is sort of a hold-back. The camera runs on a 16-volt Arriflex battery, and does quite well even under very cold conditions, as there is only one gear in the main drive system. The rest is done by gilmer belts. The temperature when going out of the airplane at 14,000 feet for the sky diving sequence was -15 degrees F, and there was only one battery running the camera at 30 F.P.S.
 
More in 70mm reading:

The Passing of Bob Gaffney, 1931 - 2009

"Sky over Holland" Film Credits

"Motion"

MCS 70 - Superpanorama
Jan Jacobsen
"Fanny's Wedding"

Internet link:

Sherry's Keepsakes
Bob Gaffney on imdb.com

Robert "Bob" Gaffney (08.10.1931)
The MCS 70mm reflex camera, used to photograph “Motion” and “Sky Over Holland”. Designed by Jan Jacobsen, camera is of simple design and rugged construction. New hand-held version is much more compact and lighter in weight. Camera runs on a 16-volt battery, accommodates lenses ranging from 17˝ mm to 6OO mm.

The camera body itself has all the standard three- eights-sixteen screw holes for mounting on American heads and tripods.

The viewing system, while not as classy as that of the new Todd-AO hand-held reflex camera, is quite good. It affords an excellent image on all the lenses down to the 52mm. Then, there is same cut-off in the viewing due to the barrel of the wide-angle lens entering the light path of the 45-degree reflection to the ground glass. However, this is minimal. It occurs on the left side of the frame, looking at the image erect, and only covers one/seventh of the field on the 37mm, 25mm, 21mm, and 171hmm lenses. These lenses are used mostly for those effect shots where looking through the camera, except for initial set-up, are quite impossible.

There were many interesting and difficult situations during the shooting of both films. The sky diving presented the biggest challenge for me. Most people in the business would say, "Why not give up and shoot it 35mm squeeze". Like Lin Dunn, I am a 70mm nut, and always will be. No one will ever convince me that Technirama, Techniscope, etc. (including 35mm Panavision) can ever match the quality of a good 65mm negative. The N.A.S.A. 35mm Panavision material in the “Motion” film does not begin to compare in quality with the 65mm material. Also, in any kind of squeeze system, the lenses are not wide-angle enough to do some of the things that are essential in my kind of filming. For example, what lens could I use when the only place available to mount the camera on an aerobatic airplane places the lens 14 inches away from the pilot's head? I have never heard of a squeeze lens equivalent to the M.C.S. 21mm or 25mm spherical lenses. It would have to be a 10 mm anamorphic!
 
 
With door open, extremely simple threading pattern of M.C.S. camera is revealed. Though movement is of simplified design, picture it produces is rock-steady on the Screen. Camera held up well under the most demanding conditions, including repeated drops from aircraft.

We decided for whatever reasons to stick to the 65mm format. The story of the free-fall filming is pretty accurately covered in the preceding article. The technical part of it is another story in itself. When we decided not to try any more jumps with the camera tied to the sky diver, we had to build a device for the camera to free fall by itself. This was not easy, as we only had one camera, which was constantly being used on the production. The next best thing was to make a mold of the camera and send it ahead of us to California, so that work could begin on the free-fall rig. As it turned out, I finished shooting the rest of the film before the camera mold was ever needed. It took 2 months to figure out the right shape to drop so that it would fall at exactly the right speed. Once the shape was determined, the rest was just a matter of waiting nervously on the ground for the chute to open. The camera seemed to have an affinity for landing at least one mile away {sometimes more) from the nearest road where we could get in with a jeep. The winters in northern California are quite wet: Hand carrying the 195-pound camera system out of muddy fields for a mile or more got to be a running gag. The sky-divers, of course, could steer their chutes to the road. They would then say to me, "Gaffney, your camera is out there in the field".

The camera, with the 500-foot magazines, weighs about 55 pounds. When I told the dragster driver that I wanted to mount the camera up front on a welded steel stand 4 feet off the ground facing him, he gulped hard, and said he would do it if his own man did the welding. When the welding job was finished, the driver approved it, and said that we had better film on the first run because "these crazy dragsters can blow an engine rather easily". Off he went without even feeling how the car would react with all the extra weight out front-from stand-still to 200 MPH in 13 seconds. The car gave one short agonizing swerve; the driver straightened it out, and went for the rest of the run. We then moved the camera to the position over his shoulder for the reverse, and I'll be damned if he didn't match the same swerve. Afterwards he informed us that he thought "You'd like a little of the same action in the second shot", even though I hadn't had the nerve to ask him to repeat his former act.
 
 
In the Dutch picture, “Sky Over Holland”, everyone wonders why, during the sea scenes, there was no water on the lens. "We have worked out a very simple device which is completely foolproof. We can shoot during mist, spray, waves hitting the camera, driving rain, and you-name-it. The lens remains absolutely clean and clear. I am not permitted to go into any more detail just now, as the patents are still pending, but I will say merely that it is a simple operation requiring little extra equipment and it can be run off the camera battery.
 
 
 
Go: back - top - back issues - news index
Updated 28-07-24